It's weird, but my question is about customer portal user settings :) I changed my user's settings to bring "my cases" (customer portal) as the homepage when I log into https://insight.rapid7.com/ Now, I can't go to "user settings page", or even, I can't log out (when I click the log out, it brings me back to my cases) :)))) I really feel awkward for asking this but I couldn't find a solution yet. How can I change my settings, i.e. change my homepage or add a product that I owned?
Posted by Muharrem Aydin about 5 hours ago
I installed metasploit community now when i run my msfconsole command in my terminal . The msfconsole not working. It is giving the following results . My operating system is Ubuntu 18.__ <pre><font color="#000000"><b>Traceback</b></font> (most recent call last): 34: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/bin/msfconsole:23:in `<main>' 33: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/bin/msfconsole:23:in `load' 32: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/metasploit-framework-4.17.61/msfconsole:49:in `<top (required)>' 31: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/metasploit-framework-4.17.61/lib/metasploit/framework/command/base.rb:81:in `start' 30: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/metasploit-framework-4.17.61/lib/metasploit/framework/command/base.rb:63:in `require_environment!' 29: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-188.8.131.52/lib/rails/application.rb:328:in `require_environment!' 28: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/polyglot-0.3.5/lib/polyglot.rb:65:in `require' 27: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/backports-3.15.0/lib/backports/std_lib.rb:9:in `require_with_backports' 26: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/backports-3.15.0/lib/backports/std_lib.rb:9:in `require' 25: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/metasploit-framework-4.17.61/config/environment.rb:5:in `<top (required)>' 24: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-184.108.40.206/lib/rails/railtie.rb:194:in `method_missing' 23: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-220.127.116.11/lib/rails/railtie.rb:194:in `public_send' 22: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-18.104.22.168/lib/rails/application.rb:352:in `initialize!' 21: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-22.214.171.124/lib/rails/initializable.rb:54:in `run_initializers' 20: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:205:in `tsort_each' 19: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:226:in `tsort_each' 18: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:347:in `each_strongly_connected_component' 17: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:347:in `call' 16: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:347:in `each' 15: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:349:in `block in each_strongly_connected_component' 14: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:431:in `each_strongly_connected_component_from' 13: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:350:in `block (2 levels) in each_strongly_connected_component' 12: from /opt/metasploit/ruby/lib/ruby/2.5.0/tsort.rb:228:in `block in tsort_each' 11: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-126.96.36.199/lib/rails/initializable.rb:55:in `block in run_initializers' 10: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-188.8.131.52/lib/rails/initializable.rb:30:in `run' 9: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-184.108.40.206/lib/rails/initializable.rb:30:in `instance_exec' 8: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-220.127.116.11/lib/rails/application/finisher.rb:56:in `block in <module:Finisher>' 7: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-18.104.22.168/lib/rails/application/finisher.rb:56:in `each' 6: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-22.214.171.124/lib/rails/engine.rb:346:in `eager_load!' 5: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-126.96.36.199/lib/rails/engine.rb:469:in `eager_load!' 4: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-188.8.131.52/lib/rails/engine.rb:469:in `each' 3: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-184.108.40.206/lib/rails/engine.rb:471:in `block in eager_load!' 2: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-220.127.116.11/lib/rails/engine.rb:471:in `each' 1: from /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/railties-18.104.22.168/lib/rails/engine.rb:472:in `block (2 levels) in eager_load!' /opt/metasploit/apps/pro/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/wicked-0.5.0/app/controllers/wicked/wizard_controller.rb:5:in `<top (required)>': <font color="#000000"><b>uninitialized constant ApplicationController (</b></font><font color="#000000"><u style="text-decoration-style:single"><b>NameError</b></u></font><font color="#000000"><b>)</b></font></pre>
Posted by himanshu 2 days ago
hello, (I have to say that I am French, and that I translate since google translation then pardon in advance) I have a problem when I run metasploit windows (10) it seems to me that: [-] *** [-] * WARNING: No database support: No database YAML file [-] *** and when i do db_status he tells me: [*] postgresql selected, no connection my version of metasploit: Framework: 5.0.30-dev-b67b48fd50fad6d9c2834571b540f101c80a4029 Console: 5.0.30-dev-b67b48fd50fad6d9c2834571b540f101c80a4029 it seems to me that this is the last still sorry for the translation
Posted by ralph 2 days ago
I've got a chart with a query along the lines of... ``` where(hostname = "someservername" AND method = GET) calculate(count) ``` The chart renders just fine but has a weird name like: "Some Server Name GET". If the name is longer due to the query then I'll lose information in the chart legend which is counterproductive. Can I provide some label or name for a field on a chart to make it more meaningful and useful?
Posted by Mike Hall 3 days ago
I have an api user. The user has been given access to a report. The api call to view the report works. When I make the api call to generate the report, I get back a 404 "The resource does not exist or access is prohibited." https://help.rapid7.com/insightvm/en-us/api/index.html#operation/generateReport What needs to be done to allow the user access to generate the report?
Posted by Barry Coleman 7 days ago
When I am scanning the error showed is: Failed (java.io.IOException: The Nmap exit value is not zero: -1073741819 at com.rapid7.nexpose.scan.nmap.Nmap.start(Unknown Source) at com.rapid7.nexpose.scan.nmap.Nmap.run(Unknown Source) at com.rapid7.nexpose.scan.Scan.start(Unknown Source) at com.rapid7.nexpose.scan.Scan.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) )
Posted by akarsh 8 days ago
Maybe there is a really simple way to do this and I have just missed it, but is there a way to edit the legend and not have it just be the query used for the graphing? Functionally it can be a bit difficult for other users to determine which visualizations represent what.
Posted by Andre McLean 8 days ago
Hello, The "SQL Query Export" template isn't there when I go to create a report logged in as a global administrator. How do I enable it? We're running version 6.5.66 Enterprise Edition. Here's our license details: --------------------------------------- LICENSE DETAILS View information about your current license, such as how many Scan Engines you can use and how many assets you can see. License status Activated Expiration xxxxxxx Max. scan engines 2 Licensed assets 256 Max. assets w/hosted engine 0 SCADA scanning - Discovery scanning - PCI reporting Enabled Web application scanning Enabled Policy scanning Enabled Policy Manager - Perpetual License Enabled FDCC scanning - USGCB scanning - CIS scanning - DISA scanning - Custom policy scanning - Policy Editor - Customizable CSV Export - Advanced reporting - Multi-tenancy - Scan Engine Pool - Adaptive Security - Dynamic Discovery - Virtual Scanning - Mobile -
Posted by hlwilliams 9 days ago
Hi Rapid7 team I am Khoa. Current, I install metasploit for a bank in windows server 2012 . I installed and ran but when I update new version of metasploit, it errored service “metasploit Pro Service”. Current. This service not start and not writed log error to file therefore I did’t searched error. I don’t fix this error and i installed old version. How to fix this error when I update new version ?
Posted by Khoa Duy 10 days ago
where( /4624/ OR /4625/ OR /4678/ OR /4769/ OR /4776/ OR /4672/ AND destination_account != "idr_admin") I am trying to eliminate the idr_admin account from the results, but when I run it, I still have that account listed in the returned results. What am I missing?
Posted by Kerry LeBlanc 10 days ago
Hello, I am trying to send test emails from Metasploit Pro Social Engineering campaign. I'm using SendGrid. What are the settings for SendGrid? smtp.sendgrid.net? For host and domain (both smtp.sendgrid.net)? When I try that I get a "connection timeout error." I'm using my SendGrid username and password from their website. Like my normal login. So what should I enter for SendGird connected to Metasploit Pro? Please reply. Thanks
Posted by Mike Held 10 days ago
For CIS version 1.0.0 the check looks like 1. Ensure 'logoff' is 'Equals' to 'AUDIT_SUCCESS' This variable is used in Rule "(L1) Ensure 'Audit Logoff' is set to 'Success'" -> "Ensure 'logoff' is 'Equals' to 'AUDIT_SUCCESS' is AUDIT_SUCCESS Example: But for CIS version 1.1.0 the checks looks like 1. Ensure 'logoff' is 'Equals' to 'AUDIT_SUCCESS_FAILURE' This variable is used in Rule "(L1) Ensure 'Audit Logoff' is set to 'Success'" -> "Ensure 'logoff' is 'Equals' to 'AUDIT_SUCCESS_FAILURE' is AUDIT_SUCCESS Example: 2. Ensure 'logoff' is 'Equals' to 'AUDIT_SUCCESS' This variable is used in Rule "(L1) Ensure 'Audit Logoff' is set to 'Success'" -> "Ensure 'logoff' is 'Equals' to 'AUDIT_SUCCESS' is Example: The QUESTION here is why if you setup 'Audit Logoff' to 'Success' for CIS version 1.0.0 the policy report shows the rule as passed but for CIS version 1.1.0 the rule failed? Why there are 2 checks in the CIS version 1.1.0 policy? How can you ensure that the result is passed for CIS version 1.1.0? Thank you in advance
Posted by Adrian Borlea 12 days ago